My previous closing remarks about artisanal code versus automated content sparked discussion. AI-generated code risks becoming incomprehensible spaghetti logic that escapes detection because no human examines it. Handcrafted coding - or at least human verification - offers undeniable benefits. AI-assisted writing carries substantially lower risks, since humans comprehend textual meaning. While AI-produced content flows more smoothly, it often lacks depth, though this characteristic suits reference materials appropriately. I extensively reviewed the previous piece, instructing the AI to correct inaccuracies throughout. This process proved more efficient than manual editing, with the AI incorporating feedback more rapidly, positioning it better contextually, and refining phrasing beyond my capabilities. I made no attempt to mask the AI's stylistic fingerprints, both to minimize effort and to humorously fuel AI anxiety by demonstrating its writing capabilities. This current piece represents completely manual composition. Perhaps 'artisanal code' will become established terminology.
Below is a TextEdit window on Tahoe.
。关于这个话题，钉钉提供了深入分析
my idea into existence?。关于这个话题，https://telegram官网提供了深入分析
sort : List comparable - List comparable